No, India Shut Down Pakistani Jets is False Claimed By Indian Chief . On 11 May, Pakistan Air Force press Pakistan Air Force’s (PAF) Aurangzeb Ahmed is presented proof that Pakistan jammed Indian jets. Due to this, they were in panic from many ghost signals and became confused. Due to this, Pakistan locked more than 20 Indian jets and shot down 7 jets with BVF 200+ km distance.
Picture :- ISPR YOUTUBE
Did India Shot down any Pakistan (PAF) Jets AWACS With S-400
No, this claim is also false according to the Pakistani presentation. They showed that the AWACS aircraft was 600–800 km away from the Indian border, in the KPK region, during Operation Swift Retort. The S-400 system, deployed at the Adampur base in the Indian-occupied Kashmir region, has a maximum range of only about 300 km. Therefore, it would not have been capable of shooting down any Pakistan Air Force F-16 jets from that distance :- Picture Defense OutPost
- Is India Really Shoot f-16 ?
No the reason is that it was a Beyond Visual Range (BVR) combat between Pakistan and India, and the F-16 was an older machine, likely from the 3rd generation. Pakistan primarily used its own manufactured aircraft, the JF-17, and the J-10C equipped with Chinese long-range PL-15 missiles.
- Is Pakistan Down Indian Jets ?
Yes, it’s true Pakistan shot down six Indian jets and one drone. Meanwhile, Pakistan locked on to more than 20 other jets but remained in a retaliatory rather than an escalatory or aggressive stance. All wreckages were recovered on the Indian side, between 200–300 km from the Pakistan–India border, spanning from Kashmir to Punjab, during what became the longest air combat in history, lasting over 140 minutes.
How Many Indian Jets Were Shot Down by PAF With Proof and Wreckage Evidence
There are five Indian jet wreckages confirmed, with all evidence supported by eyewitness accounts and photographs provided by local villagers and native Indian citizens, further validating the incidents beyond any doubt.Fact Check and Not Photoshop
Conformation By independent Channel Sources in India
| Location | Details |
|---|---|
| Bathinda (Aklian Kalan) | Wreckage of a possible Rafale or Mirage-2000 spotted near the air base. |
| Pampore (Wuyan village) | 1× Rafale debris with a French manufacturer’s label recovered under military supervision. |
| Akhnoor (Jammu & Kashmir) | Su-30MKI fighter jet reportedly crashed in this area. |
| Akalia Kalan (Punjab) | Rafale crash site with casualties; wreckage secured by authorities. |
| Ambala | Rafale crash site with wreckage secured; reports indicate possible combat loss. |
Why Did Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh Lie to the Nation?
It was due to immense pressure from the Indian media and even confirmation from former U.S. President Donald Trump that five jets were downed in the Pakistan Vs India conflict though Trump did not specify which side’s jets were lost. This likely pushed the Air Chief to claim that India had shot down five jets using the S-400 system, without providing any credible source, wreckage records, or verifiable evidence after 91 Days of operation Sindoor . As a result, no major international media outlet highlighted the Indian Air Chief’s statement. The claim appeared to be propaganda aimed at maintaining the image of strength and power for Indian citizens.
What is response of Pakistan after Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh Statement
Pakistani Defense Minister Khawaja Asif strongly rejected Air Chief Marshal Amar Preet Singh’s claims, stating that no Pakistani jets were shot down. The Pakistan Air Force (PAF) took special note of the fact that their aircraft sustained no damage throughout the duration of the fighting. They pointed out the absence of relevant proof, any wreckage, or independent confirmation which would validate the Indian claim, deeming it baseless propaganda.Official spokesmen for Pakistan went on to claim that these were attempts to confuse the people of India and that the intention was to conceal India’s confirmed losses of aircraft.
They said, “Let’s count the jets from both sides independently to see who lost their jets and who did not”
Picture :- ARY News
Did Really Pakistani DGMO Called Indian DGMO For Ceasefire ?
ISPR’s Official Position on the Ceasefire
Pakistan did not request a ceasefire. DG ISPR Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry explicitly stated:
“Let me put it on record: Pakistan never requested a ceasefire.” The Express TribuneArab News
He clarified that after Indian attacks on the night of May 6–7, it was India that sought a ceasefire, and Pakistan responded only after launching its military retaliation under Operation Bunyan-un-Marsoos. The Express Tribune+1
In this response, Pakistan targeted 26 Indian military installations. These strikes were described as precise, controlled, and executed to restore deterrence not a sign of weakness.
What CNN Reported on Pak-india Ceasefire?
“India reportedly sought assistance from the US, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey to help…”
CNN Reported I was just talking to a source who was literally in the room where it happened where Secretary of State Marco Rubio I was told played a massive role in bringing about this ceasefire a ceasefire that on multiple times today and even yesterday because it was in the works yesterday perhaps over the last 48 hours as we’ve been reporting Pakistan was sort of on a military pause uh to give a window for diplomacy. Uh what I understand from this source is that that was blown out of the window early this morning when India attacked three air bases. one of them here in the capital just on the outskirts of the capital that uh according to the source Pakistan responded with a relentless a massive barrage of missiles and rockets they say Pakistan says into Indian military facilities bases inside India air bases weapon storage and along that disputed line of control in Kashmir against military bases there they say that thisfrom the Pakistan perspective their
communication actions, how they were communicating with Secretary Rubio.
“That that really put India on the back foot. It didn’t know what had happened. India, according to Pakistan, reached out to Secretary Rubio, reached out to the Saudis, reached out to the Turks, reached out to others to find a diplomatic offramp. Got engaged after that onslaught uh in diplomacy”,
but telling uh the mediators that uh that they were going to go on a pause on the Indian side and then according to Pakistan, that didn’t happen. There was another exchange of rocket fire that happened several times during the day today. And it was only in the last couple of hours before this ceasefire came into effect just about an hour or so ago that there was enough of a pause to call it and say that this was real that enough diplomacy and leverage have been put on both sides to get them to stop here. Now the key issue for Pakistan going forward is water. India
has still said it’s cut off the water from those three vital rivers from the uh mountains in Kashmir vital to to
Pakistan existential to Pakistan I said what about that and the source said look.
Conclusion
Indian kill claims: No reliable evidence.
Pakistani kill claims: Various confirmations from eyewitnesses, wreckage, and even some Indian independent sources.
Ceasefire: On the initiative of India under international mediation following Pakistani retaliatory attacks.
Follow us for more
India Shut Down Pakistani Jets
India Shut Down Pakistani Jets
India Shut Down Pakistani Jets
